onsdag 21 oktober 2015

One S'hot too many - an Israel vs. Egypt after action report!


This guy blew my mind...


The other week me and my friend and opponent - Mr. Krieger -  played a Flames of War game, and since I'm really looking forward to the coming cold war version of FoW, "Team Yankee", I wanted to play the next best thing - the Arab-Israeli war of 1967!

Now, we decided that Mr: Krieger would play the Israelis, while took command of the egyptian (or United Arab Republic(s), actually) heavy armour.
We decided on about 1400 pts each - mostly since thats all my UAR-forces can muster. It's an expensive army! The Israelis have been seen here in my last post, and being super-duper-shots-with-veterans are quite cost effective and quicker to paint...
These were the Israeli tankers:

Eight tanks - of which four are a real pain in the bum (front 12, AT 18!) - and nine infantry bases, including two belgian bazookas!
Against this armoured spear plowing through the Sinai desert were these Egyptian warriors: 


Thats 25 tanks, 29 if you count the armoured transports, supported by four bases of infantry with a...Belgian bazooka (was there a discount on Blindicides around -67 or something?). If that wasn't enough, some MIG's have managed to get airborne, despite the Israeli air fighters clutteirng the desert skies.
Eleven tanks are heavy Iosef Stalins, with an impressive front armour (13 in FoW), and an AT 15 gun. The other tank company is nine T-55's, with front 12 and AT 16. Still, all of those tanks have only ROF 1, and are rated conscripts - making them very easy to hit (2+).

Forward! Counterattack! Push the Israelis back to the sea! Throw better dice!


So, on to the battlefield! My desert board is a bit smaller than 6x4, being rather 5x3,5. Still, its big enough, and being the Sinai desert, I chose to keep some open areas. I put a road and a town next to it, in the midst of the board, making a good reason for the fighting to take place here! Capturing this town is probably vital to the Israelis if they are to keep their momentum.


The battlefield before setup
I think we rolled for a scenario, which was Dust Up - the table is divided into quarters, and each side places an objective in their and the opponents deployment quarter. Half of each force must then be placed in reserves. These arrive from opposite the starting quarters. The goal is simple - take an objective in your enemies corner, while defending your own!

I chose my T-55's and the AA-tanks as my reserves, deploying the recon company and the IS-tanks to guard the objective.  With their heavy front and side armour, they should be a real tough nut to crack. The recon company will use their spearhead move, to try a flanking maneuver, or just generally keep the pressure on the Israelis, perhaps forcing them to make a mistake.

Mr. Krieger chose his infantry to deploy on the board, digging in, smoking cigarettes, and drinking some water in a oasis. Since warrior teams do not count as platoons, the first and second in command S'hots should be able to hold out until the rest of the S'hots arrive. 


Both forces set-up before the battle commences



The first two turns started with the UAR forces moving forward using the spearhead move, hoping that the Israelis would miss, or at least not focus on the Stalins! The Israelis however quickly dispatched two PT-76's and the leading BTR50, bailing one tank on the first turn. Then they went on and wrecked an IS-3 and bailed another... However, the bailed PT-76 kept being bailed, keeping that platoon in play for a while longer.
Seeing the IS-3's getting hit by Israeli deathrays, I moved back the Stalins, hiding them them behind the safe walls of the town. Yes, I'm a coward, so sue me!

End of the second turn...

The Egyptian turn 2 started good though, with the T-55s arriving from reserves. They immidiately moved forward, manage to get into range and even roll a six - killing the commanding S'hot! And if that wasn't enough, a flight of MIG-17's swoop down, aiming for the other, killing it in a hail of cannon fire...

Ka-blam! The T-55's score a hit and kill the Israeli commander!

The MIG (yes, I know its unpainted!) manages a straight hit into the Centurions weak rear top armour...

...however, on the Israeli turn 3, the two reserve S'hots arrive, avenging their falling comerades. Still, things looked good for me! 

The next batch of Israeli S'hots roll out, guns blazing


On the Egyptian third turn I moved forward the T-55's, aiming straight for the objective, while my IS-tanks started to slowy move towards the lower edge of the board. My plan being to secure that end off the table against the AMX's (soon to arrive from reserve), and after that move along the narrow lane between the town and the hill towards the objective.

This was the end of the Israeli turn 3, if my memory serves me right...

On the following turn, the T-55's managed to take out one more S'hot, while moving onto the objective. Those stabilizers surely make a difference - despite the ROF1 one can hit enemies on 5's and 6's, much is better than not at all!  Mr. Kriegers AMX-13 light tanks also rolled out, with an intention to flank the T-55's - but the last S'hot retaliated, finishing off another two T-55's and forcing the three remaining Egyptian tanks to go home.

However, spirits were high in the Egyptian command. With only one S'hot left, the fast-hitting AA ZSU-57-2 tanks rolling in and most of my IS tanks on the table - the only real threat (I thought) was the AMX tanks.


End of Turn 4 - I've hid the ZSU-57's behond a flaming IS-tank, in case the AMX's were to make a silly move. The IS tanks continue to slowly roll around the edge of the town walls...


Turn 5 was here, and the AMX-tanks moved out, ready to charge the Stalin-tanks in the next turn. This didn't worry me much though, since the AMX-tanks, with only rather weak cannons (AT14, ROF1) could only damage the sides of my Stalins (with side 11 armour!), at best. The S'hot tried to kill my heavies, but missed.

On this turn, I did however start to feel the problem of moving 10 slow going tanks through a small lane. I didn't want to risk any bogchecks (I tend to roll 1's then), so there was no tank that moved through the walled garden either. Still, if I can fend off the light tanks, nothting will stop me from pushing the IDF back home!

I should have moved the ZSU's from that objective...

As I had hoped for, the AMX's tried to flank my Stalins - only to be shot to pieces and forced to retreat, with no real damage done to my heavy behemots. The deciding shot came from the last PT-76, from that unfortunate recon company, still hiding in the town.  One IS-tank was blown up by that S'hot, still, nothing to worry about. I poured us some Ouzo, thinking that Mr. Krieger might need some reconciliation.

The AMX-13 tanks are routed or destroyed. As the AA-tanks finally move, in order to support the attack, I was confident that nothing could stop me from winning! [SPOILER  - I was wrong...]

So, turn 7. Two Stalins manage to roll onto the objective. The S'hot takes up a good shoooting position, where he can only see those two tanks as his closest targets, forcing me to apply any taken hits on them. Using the centurions stabiliser, he scores two hits (only 3+, even though moving) and kills them.
That's ok.
There's plenty more left.
Right?

Well this is annoying. Moving backward isn't an option though, not with these slow beasts, conscripts and all. Once this company started moving, there wasn't really much left to do but keep on forward
On the Israeli 8th round, that single Israeli hero managed to hit and kill my commander. Bailing out of the burning wreck, I continued to shout my orders. Or at least I like to imagine I did.
The S'hot made a nice Israeli stormtrooper move, and moved out of my line of fire.

Trying to make our Soviet advisors proud, the UAR moved on, while the ZSU's sneaked round the hill, hoping for a flank shot. The MIG-17 flight returned, again swooping down on the single S'hot....and missed. No worries! 

Well, exept that I no longer had any commander.
And that tank was still alive.

That MIG will miss. However, a base of IDF infantry was gunned down by the Stalins, as they contested the objective. I was again in control of our flag...


The Egyptian commander, problably wounded and without any radio, forced the recon company move out and assault the enemy infantry that have moved forward, contesting the objective and even digging in!
Now, a wiser commander would have been satisified with only taking up positions next to the Israelis, using the hull mounted guns and the las PT-76 to dig them out of there.
Maybe that Ouzo was a bad idea? 

I don't really remeber, it's all kind of hazy, but the S'hot killed some more IS-tanks, before hiding further back behind the oasis.

Egyptian turn 9 - CHARGE! They can only hit you on 2+ in defensive fire, what could possibly go wrong?
As I should have realized, charging an LMG and angry dug in FN-FAL rifle teams meant that all of the Egyptian infantrymen went down, forcing the company to roll a morale check. This they promptly failed, and drove home as fast as the soviet engines could carry them.
The IS-tanks however, even though losing more than half of their tanks, managed to suceed their morale check and stayed on the board.

So, on the last Egyptian turn, my IS-3's rolled onto the objective. Their next target was to shoot and possibly assault the IDF infantry.

Now, the ZSU's sped round the hill, hiding behind a flaming wreck, ready to flank shot that... S'hot. Mr. Krieger had carelessly exposed his turrets side, making it possible for my AT11 guns to take him out. I only have to hit the tank (with four shots on 5+), hit the turret (4+), and hope that Mr. Krieger rolls below 5+ for me to win. Oh, and I have to roll a good firepower test too. Not the greatest odds, but I was growing desperate - even if the IS-tanks defeat the infantry, that S'hot could easily take them out in the next round and any further lost tank meant another morale check.

The IS-tanks shot the IDF-infantry dead. 
Good.
Then the ZSU's fired, and missed. 
That's bad. 
Really bad. 
The IS-tanks made an "shooting to sucessful" move, regrouped on the objective and we all waited for the return fire from that damned, stinking, evil, super-s'hot.

Egyptian turn 10, right before the shooting phase.

Blam. The Israeli tank slowly turned his turret, took aim, and blew the Egyptian tanks into smitherines. 
Seeing this, the four remaining UAR tanks - since long missing their commander - automatically failed the force morale at the beggining of the Egyptian turn, and fled back the way they came. 
I had lost.
To one, single S'hot. That tank managed to take out 6 IS-3's and two ZSU's, winning the battle almost all by itself! Impressive.

Israeli turn 11, right after the shooting phase.

The battle ended as the Israeli forces moved in to the now undefended town, opening the route for following IDF forces. Losses were heavy, but the Egyptian counter attack had been thwarted...

After the battle, the area is littered with burning wrecks...


...as the remaining Israeli forces plan their next move - yes, mr. pointing-infantry-guy, no need to rub it in!



All in all, an exciting and very entertaining game. Sure, we problaby missed some rules, and I should have used my units much better - but I always enjoy a game that has it's own narrative, instead of the metagaming so common in pointbased games like FoW. 
We both had great fun, and I didn't mind losing at all - it could have gone either way right to the last round. In the end, it was one s'hot too many...

Now, I should finish the last half-painted units in my UAR-army (including that MIG) as we all wait for Team Yankee!
Cheers!

/Bartosz



















torsdag 23 juli 2015

FoW - Israeli tanks and infantry

I've been quite busy lately, and among other things I've finished some of my Israelis for Flames Of War and their Arab-Israeli Wars – the ”Fate of Nation” book.The period here is the 1967 "Six-day war".

So, let's get on with it then! All figures are Battlefront. I liked the tanks a lot, with nice detail. The infantry has great poses (the sculpts somehow remind me of Peter Pig's minis...), though the helmets could have been better, with the netting and the bicycle inner tubes holding the helmet covers barely there on some places. The uniforms look great though. I took the photos with my Canon Proshot1, but I still have to learn to use focus properly on such small objects. Most of the time, figures and tanks not in the middle of the pic get blurred. Taking good photos of your minis is truly an art!


The infantry is painted with slightly greener colours than suggested by Battlefront (when they still used Vallejo-colours, that is). I used US dark green highlighted with Russian Uniform for my figures. The helmets are German camo beige, as is most of the webbing. The inspiration here was colour photos found on the internet. Finally, I mixed both darker and lighter skin colours among the men in this platoon, as suggested by period photos as well.



The whole platoon ready for some desert action.




The command section, with and extra Blindicide.




Three squads. BF's figures all have FN-FALs and a few UZI's, though photos I've seen show some Lee-enfields, Garands in use in -67 as well..

Weapons section. The bases are painted with english uniform, German camo pale brown, German camo beige and lastly dark Sand. The edges are painted with US Field Drab.

The FN-FAL LMG. The final tounch to the desert bases was some clump foliage, static grass and tufts from various sources, inspired by photos from the Sinai desert - not always as barren as one might think!


The S'hots and AMX-13's were painted with Vallejo colours, mostly green grey mixed with some German Camo Beige. They were weathered with various washes, some MIG-powder (mainly the exhausts) and lightly sprayed with some Vallejo Yellow Sand. Oh, and the chippings were made with a sponge and some German dark Camo Brown, and highlighted with an Ivory+green grey mix (as were some raised edges, to give that 3d-cartoonish effect I like on my figures).

A full platoon of AMX-13's. I like the speed stripes!

It was a small tank indeed...

...but very cool, in my opinion.

I like the sagging on the tracks, good work BF!

Ah, one of the better looking tanks in world history - the Centurion, or as it was called in Israel - the S'hot.

Really good models, a pleasure to paint - couldn't stop myself from adding more and more detail!

Sweden used some too, and so did Denmark - I'll paint some for the latter for a cold war gone hot project some day. Really. I will.

MIG-powders really made the exauts look the part.

The other day, during a game, none of the four got any penetrating hits - and killed everything that the Jordanians tried to throw at them!

The whole platoon assembled.


Hope You'll like it! 

//Bartosz

söndag 14 juni 2015

Chain of Command – a Polish 1939 platoon!

Hi there!

I've promised myself that I wouldn't be one of those blogging nerds that never make updates, but just as I promised myself never to buy a figure again every time I spend my savings on another minature army it didn't hold. Well, anyways, here are some (half-crappy) pics of my recently finished Polish platoon for Chain of Command (or any other rule-set, for that matter).

Do broni!


The figures are soft plastics from ”First to Fight” and HaT-figures. I like the FiF ones, although they have some failings, such as weak weapon sculpts and strange proportions in the kneeling figures and most of the guys feet – they all have very big feet. They are however a big improvement over the old HaT ones. Using some of my ”secret” dip (GW's agrax earthshadthingy mixed with matt varnish) and a some highlights helped helped a bit though, in my humble opinion.
The uniform was painted in Vallejos English uniform, highlighted with Green Brown. The polish uniform varied a bit in color, and one could easily paint the figures in for example vallejos Brown Violet for a greener shade (as suggested in the FiF's magazine that comes with the figures). In 1/72 (20mm) scale I think it's bit to dark though, but that's me.

The figures used. Got the FiF ones from my father, by the way - the man who is to blame for my wargaming madness...

Pluton!


The HaT-figures.

Figures by First To Fight. I'm sorry for the bad picture...I'll try to do better next time.

And some comparison between the HaT and First to Fight figures (didn't se any on the great interwebs):

Left - First to Fight, right - HaT.

Left - First to Fight, right - HaT.

Left - HaT, right - First To Fight. It's a replica of the Polish rogatywka in the background, just so you'll know...

Oh, and I am quite sure that the HaT-sculptor has put the gas-mask and breadbag on the wrong sides – a lot of my men are not following regulations!

Speaking of regulations – the Chain of Command rules have got the number of polish soldiers i a -39 platoon wrong. In the armylist (found here) there are only 18 men listed in a squad, though (according to all sources I could find, especially this great site) they should number 19 soldiers each (making the total in a platoon of 64 men - a LOT to paint...). The fault Too Fat Lardies have mad is that the BAR-rifle, used as a platoon support machine gun, had a four men crew, not three as listed in the rules. I belive that this miss is due to a misreading in the Polish soldiers manual (Regulamin Piechoty, that I've found here) from 1934, that's recently been translated to English from polish. The translator is a very capable person and a great wargaming aficionado, and to be honest it's easy to misread the document.
However, to prove my case, on page 53, section 110 in the Regulamin Piechoty anno 1934 the number of men in a squad is given like this (for the polish-speaking readers out there);
(…) obsługi ręcznego (lekkiego) karabina maszynowego, którą stanowią: starszy strzelec - karabinowy,celowniczy, 2-ch amunicyjnych. In english it translates to ”the crew of the (light) machine gun are; senior rifleman (strzelec and karabinowy both translates as ”rifleman”, problaly used here to underline the privates weaponry), gunner (celowniczy), two (2-ch, i.e dwóch) loaders (amunicyjnych).
So that's four crew, not three as listed in the Chain of command rules. The number of riflemen (14) is correct though, with one junior leader (though one of the fourteen men was another senior rifleman).
It's also worth noting that every soldier in the platoon was cross trained in using the BAR, meaning that it should fall last in most situations.
This last part leaves some questions regarding the rules, as I'm not sure if Too Fat Lardies should make the BAR a weapons team, instead of having as simply a part of the rifle section. Does the current rules mean that the crew members not firing the BAR function as normal riflemen, or should the be busy loading the gun – thus making the weapon crew-served? Hm...I think I should write some mails!

EDIT - after consulting this matter with the CoC-forum, I now know that there is a "new" list out there, with all my concerns solved and answered. The wz.28 BAR is now a weapons team, and is crewed by four men, making the squad 19 in alles. For those not having found the new list - such as myself - the link is here (dropbox link, with all the extra lists for CoC).

So, now I'll just paint some of my other projects, and then it's time for some 1939 Germans...

/Bartosz